Is Nuclear War Imminent?

6 Nov, 2016

"We will make sure the Iranians and the world understands that the United States will act decisively if necessary including taking military action. There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that the nuclear option should not at all be taken off the table. That has been my position consistently." Hillary Clinton
"Russia has to support the international community's effort sincerely or be held to account." Hillary Clinton
"United States is not ceding the Pacific to anyone." Hillary Clinton
"Russia and China will pay a price for they are holding up progress, blockading it - that is no longer tolerable." Hillary Clinton
"Many foolish people believe nuclear war cannot happen, because there is no winner. However, American war planners, who elevated nuclear weapons from a retaliatory role to a pre-emptive first strike function, obviously do not agree that nuclear war cannot be won." Paul Craig Roberts, October 24, 2016
"A nuclear war with Russia over Syria is being planned in earnest and craved by New World Order fanatics including the Clintons, the Obama administration and the Bushes, a "civil war" is being waged ahead of U.S. Presidential election. The future of the entire planet is at stake. The efforts to control the narrative, and the eventual outcome, are desperate and unprecedented, as has been the resistance to the imperial propaganda effort." Larry Chin, October 19, 2016
"Russia can no longer tolerate the state of affairs Washington has created in the world." Vladimir Putin

The alternative media is ablaze with the concern of thoughtful citizens worldwide, particularly in the United States, that the conflict over Syria is very likely to lead to a direct clash between the United States and Russia. According to a recent survey, half of the Russian population thinks that the Syrian conflict is likely to lead to nuclear war. The outcome of the present elections in the United States will have the most decisive influence on the course of history and will, most likely, determine whether or not the human species self-destructs, or is fit to survive.

The New World Order stands for the absolute and irreversible consolidation of the parasitic global control of the wealthiest families of the world through the final establishment of a global slave state with a substantially reduced human population. The movement towards this sinister and hideous goal has proceeded remorselessly and relentlessly through sustained deception leading to repeated and increasingly bloody wars involving nation states and religious groups. The First World War was planned by the international banking families and a few members of the British oligarchy as admirably established by numerous scholars, particularly by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor in their recent book [1]. The Second World War was also planned by the same set of families and this has also been established beyond any doubt by scholars. The admirable work of Antony Sutton [2] and more recently of Guido G. Preparata [3], has exposed the secret hand of the international bankers and their allies in bringing about World War II.

In order to promote its agenda, the Elite needs to control the public mind. For this purpose, they have carried out mergers of media companies leading to an extremely small number of corporations that own 95% of US media. In addition, they control the academia; false or distorted history text book writing in particular is their forte. But to plan future wars and to mould the public mind they employ paid "think tanks." These think tanks employ ambitious and greedy academics who, for a few paltry dollars, cook schemes for promoting global pandemonium and for bleeding mankind so that it may submit to the will of these ruthless and inhuman families. Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the late Samuel Huntington, and many others are paid intellectual slaves of the wealthiest families on planet earth. These ideologues have only one job - to churn out writings, edified as great intellectual feats, that promote the agenda of human enslavement. Their writings are first published in journals like Foreign Affairs that is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, a corporate-funded body which controls US foreign policy for the international bankers and their subservient allies.

It was in his 1997 book (The Grand Chessboard) the Brzezinski had spelled out the Elite Plan for global conquest by utilizing the abilities of the American people [4]. It is a different matter that the immense human sacrifice that the American people are likely to make for the One World Cabal will also lead to their own subjugation and possibly the breakup of the United States of America. The character and integrity of the American people has always been a threat to the One World Cabal. If the American public wakes up to the reality of the deception and mind control to which they have been subjected, the dreams of the One World Cabal will evaporate. That is why there is so much effort and planning devoted to controlling the narrative about what is going on in the world and the role of this evil Cabal in the present and past centuries in carrying out planned worldwide bloodshed. Let us quote from Brzezinski's book. In the concluding paragraph of the Introduction to the book Brzezinski states (emphasis in original) [4]:

"The ultimate objective of American policy should be benign and visionary: to shape a truly cooperative global community, in keeping with long-range trends and with the fundamental interests of humankind. But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book."

Please note that there is no question of managing global affairs in partnership with Eurasia. To understand the above quote we will, shortly, quote from other parts of the book. But in the above quote one must substitute the word 'coercive' for 'benign', the term 'visionary' may be understood to mean The New World Order goal, and for the phrase 'challenging America' one must substitute the phrase 'challenging the One World Cabal' or challenging the international banking families or simply challenging the Elite. By the phrase 'cooperative' Brzezinski means 'subservient'. Also, in the above quote, for the word 'humankind' one must substitute the phrase international banking Cabal or the One World Cabal or simply the Elite. It is quite clear that the Elite strategy is to prevent Russia and China from emerging as the major powers on the Eurasian continent, a continent to which they belong. Since the One World Cabal controls the United States comprehensively but cannot control China and Russia to the same extent, the power, and even the very integrity of both must be broken. This will require subverting them, surrounding them with hostile neighbours and US military bases, and then trapping them in a war in which the US forces will be used in an attempt to destroy both countries separately or simultaneously depending upon the situation. That is the end goal.

The problem is that even though through sustained control of media and academia, the American people have been brain-washed and "dumbed down", there still is a lot of character and morality and humanity in the marrow of the American public. The question then is: how to bring the American public to agreeing to this inhuman goal? The strategy of handling the American public has been spelled out by Brzezinski, on behalf of his masters, in the following words ([4], p 24 - emphasis added):

"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of Pearl Harbour."

It has been established beyond a shadow of doubt by Robert B. Stinnett [5] that Pearl Harbour was the result of a planned provocation by Franklin Delano Roosevelt and a coterie of confidantes, in order to take the United States of America into World War II. It has been established by Sutton that FDR was an Elite agent [6]. FDR was also a Freemason.

In the same paragraph, from which we have quoted, Brzezinski states that polls conducted in 1995 and 1996 indicate "a general public preference for 'sharing' global power with others, rather than for its monopolistic exercise." The desire for monopolistic control over the globe is NOT the desire of the American people but of the One World Cabal on whose payroll men like Brzezinski subsist. Brzezinski views this healthy and humane trait of the American public as disadvantageous to Elite interests. Therefore, it has to be done away with. How? Through coercion. Here is what he has to say ([4], pp 35-36):

"It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained global supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is, defence spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization."

Please note that in the previous quote he has used the word "benign" and in this quote he has used the words "autocratic" and "military intimidation". If one analyses the content of this diabolical paragraph, one can immediately identify that Democracy, i.e. the American constitution, must be destroyed first and foremost. Secondly a sudden and "grave threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being" must be created. The goals have been achieved through 9/11, an inside job, and the new consequent but fraudulent threat of "terrorism" through false flag attacks and through their role in the creation of ISIL/Dae'sh. 9/11 is the new Pearl Harbour! Under the garb of countering "terrorism", American militarism has not just been projected abroad, the internal US law enforcement has been increasingly militarized and the United States has been rapidly transformed into a police state. John Whitehead's 2013 book carries the title: A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State; his 2015 book carries the title: Battlefield America: The War on the American People. Whitehead is a constitutional lawyer. All this is being done in accordance with the Elite plan spelled out in Brzezinski's book. If the people do not want wars they will compelled to become cannon fodder for manipulated wars. They will be intimidated and made homeless and hungry so that they may beg the Elite for a few morsels for themselves and their children, and for a cover over their heads in return for going to war or working in labour camps. And they will be so terrified at the prospect of missiles raining down on the United States that they will shout "hallelujah" and rejoice when the Elite offers up the "only scenario" that "can now save them and the world".

In parallel with the publication of Brzezinski's book, the formulation of the PNAC report by a bunch of neocons also started, as did operation Gladio B for dismantling the USSR, followed by the staging of 9/11 to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc., followed by the deliberately created housing crisis in which 10 million homes were foreclosed, followed by the Ukraine crisis, etc. All these are links in the pre-planned chain of events leading up to the final showdown. Four "missions" were specified in PNAC. These were: i) to defend the American homeland; ii) fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major war theatres; iii) perform the "constabulary" duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions; iv) transform U.S. forces to exploit the "revolution in military affairs". This infamous PNAC report was apparently formulated to promote the interests of the defence industry. But, as established by Dean Henderson, members of the international banking families are among the top 10 stockholders in each of the top 500 corporations of the world, the so called Fortune 500 companies. This includes the defence industry. Therefore, the PNAC report, with its hideous aim of taking the United States to a war of global conquest, and if need be multiple wars simultaneously, is meant for the achievement of one and only one target: A One World slave state run by the international banking families and their stooges and subservient allies: this is the New World Order.

While spelling out the Elite strategy for conquest of the Eurasian heartland, Brzezinski has stated the importance of Ukraine in the following words ([4], p 46):

"Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chess-board, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. . . . However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as its access to Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia."

The above 1997 statement explains why the United States is doing what it is doing in Ukraine now, in 2012, 2016 - destabilizing it and finally creating a situation in which it has been divided. The troubles in Ukraine stem from the above policy perception of the CFR, the mouthpiece of the wealthiest families on the planet.

There is a further statement in the Brzezinski book which shows that the present global situation has not emerged as a result of a sequence of disconnected events, but has, instead, resulted from a deliberate and diabolical plan to get hold of the resources of the Eurasian land mass for the Elite. He writes (p 30): "For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia." He then goes on ([4], p 31, emphasis added):

"A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent. About 75 percent of the World's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for 60 percent of the world's GDP and about three fourths of the world's known energy resources."

It is the wealth and the energy resources of Eurasia that are the target of the limitless greed of the Elite that also owns the four largest oil companies of the world among others. These resources lie primarily in the Muslim countries in the Middle East and in Central Asia - in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Azerbaijan, etc. In Africa the Sudan, Nigeria, Libya are oil rich, have dominantly Muslim populations, and all three have been ravaged by war and violence prompted by the CIA and other NATO agencies. That these resources are in Muslim countries means that subversion and wars will have to be waged to control these regions and to apportion their entire wealth for the Elite. However, to deceive the Western public, the paid mouthpieces and intellectual slaves of the Elite have to formulate deceptions that would allow the Western governments, which are nothing more than vehicles for securing the interests of their corporate masters, to carry out bloodshed in these countries with impunity and without any public outcry in the U.S. and the U.K. It was for this purpose that Huntington's book was published.

As is the common practice with these intellectual slaves, an article with the title Clash of Civilizations? The Debate, was published in the summer 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs. This article resulted from a talk that Huntington gave in 1992 at the American Enterprise Institute, the well-known Elite and Zionist organisation. The article was then expanded into a book that was published in 1996 [7], followed by Brzezinski's 1997 book. Such books, which are designed to give an ideological veneer to the inhuman and illegal plunder of countries for the sake of the Elite, are given tremendous projection on the so called mainstream Western media and get rave reviews.

According to Wikipedia [8]: "The Clash of Civilizations (COC) is a hypothesis that people's cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world." So much for the long held axiom that wars are fought for economic reasons. It was Huntington who wrote [9]: "Some Westerners [...] have argued that the West does not have problems with Islam but only with violent Islamist extremists. Fourteen hundred years of history demonstrate otherwise." He also wrote: "Islam's borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam ..." The question of who planned, promoted, fanned and exploited this bloodshed and why is not addressed by Huntington. Had the oil and gas resources been in Hindu or Buddhist countries Huntington would have had to formulate such a thesis by substituting the word Buddhism or Hinduism for Islam and invent some specious argument for destroying and plundering Buddhist or Hindu lands. These books and ideas are nothing but an artificial cover, a deception, for enabling plunder and bloodshed in resource rich Muslim countries. Of course such "philosophies" have enabled the Anglo-US-Israel alliance to plunder and to destroy Iraq, Afghanistan (that is an important route for transport of oil and gas and has rich resources in rare minerals), Libya, and now Syria. The number of deaths resulting from these wars are not in millions; they are in tens of millions. Anyone who has any doubts about these numbers should read the writings of Gideon Polya.

Reverting to Central Asia it is revealing to read Brzezinski's statements about Azerbaijan, which is at the Western-most tip of Central Asia. He writes ([4], pp 46-47):

"Despite its limited size and small population Azerbaijan, with its vast energy resources, is also geopolitically critical. It is the cork in the bottle containing the riches of the Caspian Sea and Central Asia. The independence of Central Asian states can be rendered nearly meaningless if Azerbaijan becomes fully subordinated to Moscow's control. Azerbaijan's own and very significant oil resources can also be subjected to Russian control, once Azerbaijan's independence has been nullified. An independent Azerbaijan, linked to Western markets by pipelines that do not pass through Russian-controlled territory, also becomes a major avenue of access from the advanced and energy-consuming economies to the energy rich Central Asian republics. Almost as much as in the case of Ukraine, the future of Azerbaijan and Central Asia is also crucial in defining what Russia might or might not become."

It now becomes quite clear that the real interest in this region is its mineral wealth, in particular its energy resources. Those who own America, Britain and Israel, also want to own the Eurasian heartland with all its wealth. No wonder the entire set of Central Asian states was mockingly referred to as Pipelinestan! The present trouble in Syria has to do with pipelines too - and of course with securing the Rothschild outpost in the Middle East, the state of Israel.

Once the United States succeeded in blocking a Russian gas supply to Europe by subverting Ukraine, an alternate route for supplying gas to Europe from Russia was proposed. This pipeline had to get to Turkey and then gas could be supplied to Europe through Turkey. This was the origin of the topsy-turvy relation between Turkey and Russia, manipulated by the CIA et al in order to prevent the project from going through. Turkey and Russia had to be driven apart. At this point in time the situation with Turkey is not to American liking though. Syria has oil and Syria is in the way of an alternate project. Those who own the United States want to control gas supply to Europe by supplying gas to Europe from Qatar. But Syria is in the way. Syria does not wish to allow this. It must therefore be destroyed and controlled. Syria also has a military and is contiguous to Israel and so to secure Israel it must be divided. Israel also wants Syrian oil.

In order to redraw the maps Iraq and Syria the U.S., Israel, and the U.K. have set up various organisations, such as Daesh or ISIL/ISIS, Al Nusra, etc. In an article titled The Engineered Destruction and Fragmentation of Iraq, first published on June 14, 2014, Professor Chossudovsky wrote [10]:

"The Islamic State terrorists are portrayed as an enemy of America and the Western world. Amply documented, the Islamic State is a creation of Western intelligence, supported by the CIA and Israel's Mossad and financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar. We are dealing with a diabolical military agenda whereby the United States is targeting a rebel army which is directly funded by the US and its allies. The incursion into Iraq of the Islamic State rebels in late June was part of a carefully planned intelligence operation.
The rebels of the Islamic state, formerly known as the Al Qaeda in Iraq, were covertly supported by US-NATO-Israel to wage a terrorist insurgency against the Syrian government of Bashar Al Assad. The atrocities committed in Iraq are similar to those committed in Syria. The sponsors of IS including Barack Obama have blood on their hands.
The killings of innocent civilians by the Islamic State terrorists create a pretext and the justification for US military intervention on humanitarian grounds. Lest we forget, the rebels who committed these atrocities and who are allegedly a target of US military action are supported by the United States.
The bombing raids ordered by Obama are not intended to eliminate the terrorists. Quite the opposite, the US is targeting the civilian population as well as the Iraqi resistance movement.
The endgame is to destabilize Iraq as a nation state and trigger its partition into three separate entities."

In an update of the same article published on October 21, 2016, Professor Chossudovsky has added (emphasis in original) [10]:



"The capture of Mosul by the ISIS would not have occurred without US support. It was a US sponsored intelligence operation, which consisted in supporting both Iraqi government forces and the ISIS-Daesh terrorists. It was a staged event.
Similarly the "Liberation" of Mosul announced by president Obama is part of that process. It is also a staged event. It consists in evacuating the ISIS-Daesh terrorists who occupy the city of Mosul and redeploying them in Syria.
The unspoken objective is to "replace" the ISIS-Daesh and Al Nusra terrorists defeated by Syrian forces with the support of Russia with a new influx of terrorists out of Iraq. Washington has promised to protect the ISIS rebels exit and "transfer" out of Mosul on condition they go to Syria. No aerial attacks directed against retreating ISIS-Daesh rebel convoys will be launched by US-led coalition forces."

Professor Chossudovsky then emphasises that the "liberation of Mosul" is actually a cover for redeploying Dae'sh/ISIS in Syria. The conflict in Syria has therefore become more ominous. He further emphasises: "The creation of the US sponsored Islamist Caliphate has been announced. The Islamic State of Iraq and Al Cham (ISIS) has been replaced by the Islamic State (IS). The Islamic State is not an independent political entity. It is a construct of US intelligence." Professor Chossudovsky has further stressed that the conflict is described as a Shia-Sunni conflict without addressing the question as to "who is behind the various factions." He adds: "What is at stake is a carefully staged US military-intelligence agenda."

As these lines are being written (November 5, 2016) it has been reported that [11]:

"The Russian television channel Zvezda TV has shown images of the drills involving the Su-22s and MiG-29KUBs stationed on Russia's Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier's air wing. The footage was taken in the Mediterranean Sea as the ship neared the coast of Syria, where it is to take part in Moscow's military campaign against rebels seeking to overthrow Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad."

So the Soviet aircraft carrier is preparing to join the battle in Syria. With the U.S. aircraft carriers already in the Middle East the possibility of direct contact and conflict is very high now. Based on information provided by various American sources Joachim Hagopian wrote on Tuesday October 18, 2016 (emphasis in original) [12]:

"Meanwhile barely noticed in a virtual blackout in the West are at least half a dozen high alert, significant international developments this last weekend that all strongly indicate the extreme danger of a nuclear war breaking out at any time against Russia and its Eastern alliance."

He stresses that on Saturday (i.e. October 12, 2016) the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) imposed a no fly zone over Montana airspace from 3 p.m. till midnight. The FAA gave the launching of US military rockets in connection with "space operations" as the reason for this restriction. Hagopian and other writers are quick to point out that (emphasis in original) [12]:

"[Y]et the only missiles in Montana are nuclear armed warhead missiles. According to, the missile silos in Montana are armed with Multiple Independent Re-entry Vehicles (MIRV's) and each MIRV contains a 100 kiloton nuclear warhead. Within a half hour after each launch, each single rocket is capable of destroying eight cities anywhere on earth. The real question is what was the government actually up to on Saturday with nuclear missiles in Montana."

In addition to the declaration of Montana airspace as no-fly zone for 9 hours, an enormous build up of U.S. military aircraft on the Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean has been reported. B-1 and B-2 bombers, some of them painted black, have converged on Diego Garcia. Refuelling aircraft have also arrived there. A contractor has reported that the government has blocked off access roads to the airport and that so many aircraft have now accumulated that they are being parked on blocked roads. A tent city, housing excess air force and naval personnel, has cropped up on the island. All these are signs of preparations of a major war in the very near future. Why is this build up being carried out?

In addition to the above, the U.S. nuclear attack warning was raised to level 3. Level 3 nuclear war alert has been issued only on three previous occasions in U.S. history; the last one was on 9/11. Hagopian has pointed out that such a level of nuclear threat index means that the U.S. will be ready to launch a nuclear attack in 12 minutes [12]. These are very sinister developments. They have been rendered all the more sinister by the complete silence of the mainstream US media on the matter. The mainstream US media is nothing but a propaganda arm, a mind-control tool of the Elite. Thoughtful people in America and elsewhere have no respect left for this conscience-less so called media, or, to use Paul Craig Roberts' term - for these presstitutes. This author checked the threat level on November 5, 2016 and found that it had been brought down to level 4 - alert status BLUE as on October 20, 2016, at 8.00 PM. What had happened around October 12 to raise the level to 3 and keep it there for 5 days? The threat level 1 is the highest alert level and 5 the lowest - level 1 is red alert, level 2 is orange alert, level 3 is yellow alert, level 4 is blue and level 5 is green. The current warning reads [13]:

This is the DEFCON Warning System. Alert status for 8 P.M., Thursday, October 20th, 2016. Condition code is Blue. DEFCON 4.
There are currently no imminent nuclear threats against the United States at this time, however there are events occurring in the world theatre which require closer monitoring.

The DEFCON statement also reads that the United States recently suffered a major embarrassment and a strategic setback when its plans for a cyberattack on Russia were prematurely leaked. Why would the US want to launch a cyberattack on Russia without provocation? Does the U.S. want to go war with Russia as spelled out in PNAC? And then deal with China? Apparently Russia has warned that it will retaliate to a cyberattack militarily, including a nuclear attack. This situation is ominous and deeply disturbing.

The incisive, forthright, patriotic and principled Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of Treasury under Reagan, wrote an article on October 24, 2016 in which he pointed out that by entering into negotiations with the U.S. Putin had displayed some hesitation, which had given time to the Americans to contrive false charges of war crimes against him [14]. Victory for Russia on the ground was postponed. Paul Craig Roberts has stressed [14]:

"Whatever the outcome of military conflict in Syria, Russia faces a war criminal conviction by Western media, if not by the United Nations Human Rights Council, and a no-fly zone in Syria if Hillary becomes President. This is the huge cost Putin has paid for listening to the unrealistic, American-worshipping Atlanticist Integrationists who are determined that Russia be accepted by the West even if it means being a semi-vassal."

It appears that the Russian Atlanticist Integrationists and the hawks in Washington serve the same purpose - derailing and delaying Russia's victory in Syria. Russia withdrew quickly from Syria with the consequence that The Americans were able to revive ISIS and at the same time launch a campaign for criminalising Putin and Assad. By the time the Russians returned ISIS had been replenished.

A no-fly zone on Syria would require stopping Russian and Syrian planes from attacking ISIS positions by Americans and that would mean a direct clash. Hillary's plan for a no-fly zone in Syria is fraught with danger. It will certainly lead to dog fights between U.S. and Russian planes or bringing down Russian and Syrian planes by missiles. This also means denying the use of Syrian airspace to Syrian planes!

Paul Craig Roberts has also drawn attention to the madness of Hillary - she will work for regime change in Russia. So, along with Assad, she wants Putin out of office. By what yardstick and under what law? Does Putin have the right then to try to oust Hillary if she is elected? Unlike the great people of America, Washington is unreliable; in fact, utterly unreliable because it is controlled by the One World Cabal. Putin has entered into agreements with Washington, each of which has been then betrayed by Washington. As Roberts writes [14]:

"So much has happened to teach him this lesson - the Washington instigated invasion of South Ossetia by Georgia while he was at Beijing Olympics, Washington's coup in Ukraine while he was at Sochi Olympics, Washington's abandonment of the Minsk Agreement, the advantage Washington took of the Syrian ceasefire agreements, the violation of Washington's promise not to move NATO to Russia's border, Washington's sacking of Anti-ABM Treaty, the orchestrated blame of Russia for MH 17, Hillary's hacked emails, etc."

Putin would do well not to pay any heed to Washington's intrigues anymore and move swiftly and decisively in Syria. China must stand with Russia resolutely and without fear or favour. There is no other option save a global slave state with the population reduced to less than a billion, and controlled ruthlessly by the Elite on a radioactive planet. The Elite has gone mad - as Catherine Austin Fitts once put it: "those who win a rigged game get stupid." Those who control Washington have previously led humanity into the two pre-planned and manipulated world wars. If the people of America are unable to stop these elements then civilisation, as we know it, might come to an end. Russia, however, has successfully faced threats to its existence twice in the last century and will do the same again, God willing.

The possibility of a nuclear war is so serious that [12]:

"40 million Russian citizens, that's near one third of the population, just completed a massive nuclear war defence drill. Also, unlike the U.S., Moscow has built underground facilities for housing is 12 million residents under the capital city for safe refuge. Again unlike America, Russia is taking the extreme threat of nuclear war with the West very seriously. Even MSM fixture ABC News ran a story how Russians have been preparing for a nuclear winter outcome."

It is also for the first time since the cold war that the German government is advising its citizens to stockpile food and water for use in a national emergency [15]. In fact, Hagopian has pointed out that MSM (i.e. the so-called mainstream media) is keeping the American public uninformed about the danger. One reason could be that in view of Hillary's statements that the nuclear option should not be off the table, it is possible that the public might swing in favour of Trump if it finds out the truth about the very high probability of a nuclear war. Hagopian writes [12]:

"In stark contrast, outside of Putin bashing and the election sideshow, neither Washington nor its propaganda whores in the press have alerted Americans that they are currently in grave danger. In fact, it's been an MSM news blackout while Russian media has told its citizens that nuclear war is 'imminent'. Meanwhile as another sign that Putin means business, in response to NATO's nuclear missiles activated in Romania and Poland, Putin has ordered to ready his nuclear capable missiles in Kaliningrad, the Russian enclave between NATO members Poland and Lithuania."

The Russians have developed their thermonuclear Satan 2 missile which is capable of wiping out entire countries like UK and France [16].

If the people of the United States of America can wrest their country back from the Elite, even if partially, during the current elections, mankind might be spared an unprecedented bloodbath.


I am grateful to Mr. Jim Macgregor for several useful suggestions and for pointing out several typos.


Note: All the quotes from Hillary Clinton can be found in a 13 minute you tube clip, edited and collected and commented upon by Jim Corbett. The you tube reference is: HILLARY CLINTON...WANTS TO KILL US ALL...2016

[1] Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor: Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, Mainstream Publishing, 2013

[2] Antony C. Sutton: Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, first published 1976; reprinted by Clairview Books, 2010

[3] Guido G. Preparata: Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Created the Third Reich; Pluto Press 2005

[4] Zbigniew Brzezinski: The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Imperatives, Basic Books, 1997

[5] Robert B. Stinnett: The Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbour; Free Press, 2000

[6] Antony C. Sutton: Wall Street and FDR; first published 1975, reprinted by Clairview Books, 2014

[7] Samuel P. Huntington: The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, first published by Simon & Schuster, 1996


[9] The easiest way to locate these quotes is to go to Samuel P Huntington quotes:

[10] M. Chossudovsky: The Engineered Destruction and Political Fragmentation of Iraq. Towards the Creation of a US Sponsored Islamist Caliphate. The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham: An instrument of the Western Military Alliance; October 21, 2016, first published June 14, 2014;


[12] Joachim Hagopian: War between US and Russia Could Be Sooner than Later. "The Danger of a Nuclear War" ; October 18, 2016,


[14] Paul Craig Roberts: "More Dangerous than the Cold War": By Cooperating With Washington On Syria Russia Walked Into A Trap; October 24, 2016

[15] Germans Told to Stockpile Food and Water for Civil Defence:

[16] Russia unveils 'Satan 2' missile powerful enough to 'wipe out UK, France or Texas';